Programs Galore, or Controlled Spending?
Warner is apparently realizing that he needs to talk about something on his website. So, he has added a "record" section. Those pages can be summed up thusly: "I saw some deficiency, so I created a new [program / committee / task force / agency / board / project / partnership / strike force / study / initiative ] and threw money at it." Taxpayer money. I wonder how many of those things are still in existence today, whether they are needed or not, and being funded by our tax dollars. Not that all politicians don't do some of that. But, to quote Giuliani,
Now compare and contrast with Jim Gilmore, who would rather control spending and make tax cuts for families, so they can spend their own money the way they want. Now who do you want in Washington, dealing with our Federal budget? The guy who lives to create programs of every description to spend your tax dollars, or the guy who remembers where taxes come from and would try to spend them much more carefully?
"The Democrats believe in government when they have a choice. Republicans believe in people when we have a choice. . . . The Republican Party is the party of the people. The Democratic Party is the party of the government."
Now compare and contrast with Jim Gilmore, who would rather control spending and make tax cuts for families, so they can spend their own money the way they want. Now who do you want in Washington, dealing with our Federal budget? The guy who lives to create programs of every description to spend your tax dollars, or the guy who remembers where taxes come from and would try to spend them much more carefully?
Comments on "Programs Galore, or Controlled Spending?"